Application Engr I
We couldn't confirm this posting on Honeywell's site in our latest checks -- see current similar openings below.
About this opportunity
As a proposal engineer, responsible for the Oil and Gas related market instrument engineering, including HW design, material take off, installation, configuration, factory acceptance test (FAT), site acceptance test (SAT) and commissioning etc.
Description (Please list 5~8 job responsibilities)
1. Should be able to work independently for assigned work packages.
2. Preparation of Technical Specification, Datasheet, Technical queries, Technical Bid for various instruments like: Transmitters, Temperature Elements, Flow Meters, Control Valve, MOV, etc.
3. Preparation of Instrument Installation Details, Bulk Material Take off and assist designers in Modelling of instruments and junction boxes.
4. Review design documents submitted by vendors, review manufacturers’ drawings and data for compliance with specifications.
5. Assists in detailed development of established design concepts for process systems, structures and equipment.
6. Implement the configuration or other related job according the inputs and project stands and delivery on time.
7. Discuss the project standard with customers, give the proposal to customers and update accordingly.
8. Travel to site for supervise instruments installation, calibration, commissioning.
Qualifications (Education, Experience, Industry/Functional Knowledge, etc. ):
1. Bachelor's Degree or above in Instrumentation or Automation.
2. Good command of English on oral and writing, good computer skill sets
3. More than 3 years experiences of LNG/LPG/Oil filed instruments design or related job.
4. Experience in various types of field Instrumentation, also DCS, PLC, SCADA Hazardous areas is essential.
5. Previous experience in Oil & GAS Terminal/Depot design, installation, commissioning and start-up experience will be preferred.
6. Have knowledge of Tank Gauging, Metering Skid, Flow Computer, Custody Transfer Metering preference.
7. Awareness on API MPMS OMIL guidelines is preference.
8. Awareness of industry or regulatory standards and design criteria pertinent to the particular engineering discipline
Skills(Computer, Communication, Leadership, Behavior, etc):
1. Good at English and communication skill is required, can understand leader assigned works and give feedbacks.
2. Good at AutoCAD tools for design
3. Diligent, Persistence, can work under pressure with global team
4. A positive working attitude, willing to sharing knowledge to colleagues.
5. Willing to travel frequently
我们致力于营造一个包容的工作场所，包括神经多样性。我们重视拥有不同特质的个体为团队带来的独特观点和技能。
We are committed to fostering an inclusive workplace that embraces neurodiversity.
We value the unique perspectives and skills that individuals with diverse neurological conditions bring to our team.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Controls Engineering role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 496 comparable Controls Engineering roles across 18 employers.
Salary context
36 of 496 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 496 comparable roles
+ 39 more countries
Seniority mix
139 of 496 peers have a known seniority level
Currently open similar roles
This posting is closed, but here are live openings closest to it -- ranked by similarity, not by how well you'd qualify for them.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow every new Controls Engineering job, narrowed by PLC/SCADA platform, location and employer: set up a job alert.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.